M Mewtwo-EX (Y) Variants // XY-on 2016


#84

You should have at least 4 vs seeker, you could drop the energy retrieval (since you already have super rod) and a Shauna for the extra 2 (or the enhanced hammer)


#85

Well the thing is that I don;t have enough Vs. Seeker to have 4 in 2 decks. I only have 5 Vs. Seeker. But 2 actually works fine for the deck.


#86

Could you not, I don’t know, switch the cards from each deck when you want to use it?


#87

I would rather not just because to me it’s a chore. But, I actually like it more with 2 Vs. Seekers.


#88

Why not just proxy the other VS Seekers and whatever else you need?


#89

Because I am using this deck in tourneys. Plus, the deck is fine with just 2 Vs. Seekers. Why do so many people have a problem with the Vs. Seekers?


#90

Because 4 is a near necessity in any deck.


#91

I meant to say that during testing you would proxy the VS Seekers.


#92

99% of tournament-winning decks within the past 8-9 months had 4 vs seeker. It’s such a good card.


#93

Then take out the vs seeker from your other deck. You can only use one deck in a tournament at a time anyways.


#94

That is not true at all, it IS a 4-of necessity in nearly most every deck.


#95

That is very true 4 VS Seeker is a must unless its Vileplume


#96

While all of that is true, I feel that 2 actually works well for me. Plus if I use Mega Mewtwo Y and the Vs. Seekers are in my Night March deck then I can’t enter because it was a standard tourney and my Night March deck is expanded. Now, I can’t play! also, there is just not enough space in the deck for for 2 more Vs. Seekers.


#97

There is always space for more VS Seeker


#98

you couldn’t take them out of you Night March deck for one tournament?


#99

Wafflesgaming
1d
"I would rather not just because to me it’s a chore. But, I actually like it more with 2 Vs. Seekers. "

M Mewtwo Y doesn’t always hit for OHKO to the right time. 4 seeker is a must because you NEED to have access to Giovanni and Lysandre at key times in games. Without 4, I am not sure how you could win late game against some decks.


#100

Think of all the other players in the world who have this chore. I’m sure most of them care enough to build a good list and switch their vs seekers (or other staples) from one deck to another. I only have 2 playsets, but switch them between 4-5 different decks.
I see you really like your deck with 2 VS seeker. Well if you have 4, you will like it even more. I promise, it pays off.


#101

@10foulz, not trying to offend you, but I think you just quoted exactly what I quoted an why he/she can still switch out the cards. But, you have done a much better job. :smile::smile:


#102

Look, I am fine with putting in at least 3 Vs. Seekers, but that’s the most I can put in because I don’t have any more space for a fourth. I could take out the energy retrieval, but I use it for when I am low on energies, don’t have a mega turbo, and can still attach an energy for the turn. I know that 4 Vs. Seekers is the best option for any deck, but I prefer 3 because I can add in one more card that might be beneficial for a deck. I know I obviously messed up on the Vs. Seeker count, but I like the deck as it is. I can add in only one more Vs. Seeker and that’s it.


#103

if it works for you then that’s what matters. We won’t try to convert you to the 4 VS seeker club, but keep in mind 4 is better than 3 for consistency.