This is a completely random accusation. Would you care to elaborate, possibly with evidence?
I mean, yes sometimes I say things are flat out bad, but that was when the random non-competetive card/deck threads started showing up and the people were acting like they were BDIFs. I get that you like nonmeta, but don't call me a hater because I asked you to put nonmeta in an uncategorized thread.
Here's an example for you: last year there was a player who was here and liked raticate break a lot. He couldn't understand why his deck thread got shoved to the uncategorized thread while a deck like Greninja (which he wasnt the biggest fan of) had its own sprawling thread with thorough discussions. @kpiplup replied to his confusion and put it perfectly: it is the community as a whole that thinks that Greninja is good and raticate is bad, or that a meta deck is good, and a new, unseen, noncompetetive deck is bad.
So why do I act so negatively? I came to these forums in spring of 2015, looking to become a better player by gaining an understanding of how decks are built and how they are played and what their matchups are. I was a little hyper in the begining, posting trash lists for meta decks, but continuously creating new threads for random decks with no results that are "just for fun" won't help anyone become a better player or gain an understanding of the game. Call me a hater, I don't care. But I do care when you blatantly refuse to help keep the forums organized, even if I'm not a mod
EDIT: well this was pointless